Humor Dan Satire Kartun Media Massa Sebagai Komunikasi Visual Di Era Disrupsi
Abstract
cartoons that illustrate opinions by exaggerating them in mass media cartoons. This study tries to analyze how
the mass media represent current phenomena with cartoon media. This research also wants to show that
cartoons can be one way to observe people's attitudes towards a phenomenon through humor and satire in it.
The method in this research is descriptive qualitative. This research study is grouped into: 1) the target of the
study of the development of cartoons and mass media as one of the mass communication media, 2) the target
of satire and humor studies in mass communication media specifically viewed from the perspective of
cartoons, and 3) the target of the study which is obtained from the public response to cartoons, humor, satire,
and mass communication. The results showed that cartoons in the era of disruption could be used as an
effective alternative to criticism and mobilizing support for a goal. Cartoons are not only intended as humor,
but also powerful tools to drive change. The humor and satire on the card can be said to represent humorous
discursive practices that are close to satire which have become discursive land in the mass media. Assuming
that humor and satire in cartoons are a form of discourse and even education for the community
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adesope, O. O., & Rud, A. G. (2019). Contemporary Technologies in Education: Maximizing Student Engagement, Motivation, and Learning. Singapore: Springer International Publishing.
Bourdieu, P. (1999). Language and Symbolic Power. United Kingdom: Harvard University Press.
Chandler, D. (2017). Semiotics: The Basic (3rd Editio). London: Routledge.
Coebel, B. A. (2009). Comic Relief: Engaging Students through Humor Writing. The English Journal, 98(6), 38–43.
Conway, P. (2015). Preservation in the Age of Google : Digitization , Digital Preservation , and Dilemmas. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 80(1), 61–79.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
D’Angelo, F. J. (2010). The Rhetoric of Intertextuality. Rhetoric Review, 29(1), 31–47.
Daddesio, T. C. (2013). On Minds and Symbols: The Relevance of Cognitive Science for Semiotics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. http://doi.org/10.1515/9783110903003
Dadlez, E. M. (2011). Truly Funny: Humor, Irony, and Satire as Moral Criticism. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 45(Spring), 1–17. http://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.45.1.0001
Darbellay, F., & Moody, Z. (2017). Creativity Design Thinking and Interdisiplinarity. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Davis, J. M. (Ed.). (2017). Satire and Politics: The Interplay of Heritage and Practice (Palgrave S). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dentith, S. (2002). Parody: The New Critical Idiom (The New Cr). London: Routledge.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Fifth Edit). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1319-x
Dobinson, T., & Dunworth, K. (2019). Literacy Unbound: Multiliterate, Multilingual, Multimodal. Singapore: Springer International Publishing.
Etty, J. (2019). Graphic Satire in the Soviet Union: Krokodil’s Political Cartoons. Mississippi: The University Press of Mississippi. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Ezell, S. K. (2016). Humor and Satire on Contemporary Television: Animation and the American Joke (The Cultur). New York: Routledge.
Facca, A. E., & Aldrich, J. W. (2011). Putting the Past to Work for the Future. The Public Historian, 33(3), 38–57. http://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2011.33.3.38
Ferriss-Hill, J. L. (2019). Roman Satire and the Old Comic Tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Fott, D. (2009). John Dewey and the Mutual Influence of Democracy and Education. The Review of Politics, 71(Political Philosophy in the Twentieth Century), 7–19.
Gilbert, C. J. (2015). If This Statue Could Talk: Statuary Satire in the Pasquinade Tradition. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 18(Spring), 79–112. http://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.18.1.0079
Gilster. (1997). Digital Literacy. New York: Wiley.
Gomez-palacio, B., & Vit, A. (2009). Graphic Design Referenced: A Visual Guide to the Language, Applications, and History of Graphic Design. Massachusetts: Rockport Publishers, Inc.
Gopnik, A. (2019). High and Low : Caricature , Primitivism , and the Cubist Potrait. Art Journal, 43(4), 371–376.
Graham, G. (1997). Philosophy of the Art. London: Routledge.
Grossman, J. (2017). Adaptation in Visual Culture. Adaptation in Visual Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58580-2
Hall, S. (2002). Representations: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage Publications.
Hardy, D. (2017). Humour in the Visual Arts and Visual Culture: Practices, Theories, and Histories. RACAR: Revue d’art Canadienne, 37(1), 1–9.
Hawkesworth, C. J., Cawood, P. A., Kemp, A. I. S., Storey, C. D., & Dhuime, B. (2009). A Matter of Preservation. Science, 323(5910), 49–50. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168549
Haywood, I. (2019). Romanticism and Caricature. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Hicks, T., & Turner, K. H. (2013). No Longer a Luxury: Digital Literacy Can’t Wait. The English Journal, 102(6), 58–65. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957403.n296
Hutcheon, L. (2000). A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. Los Angeles: University of Illinois Press.
Ida, R. (2014). Studi Media dan Kajian Budaya. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Klein, S. R. (2013). Humor in a Disruptive Pedagogy Further Considerations for Art Educators. Art Education, 66(6), 34–39.
Konstantakos, I. M. (2015). Machon’s Alexandrian Comedy and Earlier Comic Tradition. Aevum, Anno 89(1), 13–36.
Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. van. (2012). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Lee, D. (2011). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, R. L., & Lewis, S. I. (2018). The Power of Art. New Jersey: Cengage Learning.
Liu, C. H., & Luton, F. (2011). Vygotsky’s Psycho-semiotics: Theories, Instrument and Interpretive Analyses. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Lloro-Bidart, T. (2015). A Political Ecology of Education in/for the Anthropocene. Environment and Society, 6, 128–148.
Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (Ninth edit). Essex: Pearson.
Mack, R. L. (2007). The Genius of Parody: Imitation and Originality in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century English Literature. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
Malinowski. (1944). A Scientific Theory of Culture and Other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
Martin, R. A. (2012). Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. London: Academic Press.
Martin, R. A., & Ford, T. E. (2018). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach (Second edi). London: Academic Press.
McAleer, P. R. (2010). El Proceso, Kafka, and the Comic Novel: Ana Maria Shua’s Soy Paciente and the Fear of Individual Freedom. The Modern Language Review, 105(1), 131–148.
Melton, J. (2018). When the Candle Goes Out: The Complexity of Simple Jokes and the Limits of Satire. Studies in American Humor, 4(2), 152–159. http://doi.org/10.5325/studamerhumor.4.2.0152
Mészáros, I. (2006). Marx’s Theory of Alienation (Fifth edit). New Jersey: Merlin Press.
Mills, K. A. (2016). A Review of the " Digital Turn " in the New Literacy Studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246–271.
Mills, K. A. (2019). Big Data for Qualitative Research. Routledge Focus. Oxon: Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056413
Pace, M. (2018). Subliminal Psychology 101: How to Stealthily Penetrate, Influence, and Subdue Anyone’s Mind Without Them Suspecting a Thing. Canada: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.
Painter, C., Martin, J. R., & Usworth, L. (2012). Reading Visual Narratives. United Kingdom: MPG Group Books.
Remley, D. (2017). The Neuroscience of Multimodal Persuasive Messages: Persuading the Brain. New York: Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315206325
Rossing, J. P. (2019). An Ethics of Complicit Criticism for Postmodern Satire. Studies in American Humor, 5(Special Issue: Satire Today), 13–30. http://doi.org/10.5325/studamerhumor.5.1.0013
Rowden, C. (2013). Memorialisation, Commemoration and Commodification: Massenet and Caricature. Cambridge Opera Journal, 25(2), 139–163.
Samuk, T. (2015). Satire and the Aesthetic in As You Like It. Renaissance Drama, 43(2), 117–142. http://doi.org/10.1086/683106
Schama, S. (2012). The Power of Art. London: The Bodley Head Ltd.
Schlund-Vials, C. J. (2011). Crisis of Memory: Memorializing 9/11 in the Comic Book Universe. Modern Language Studies, 41(1), 12–25.
Schultz, D. (2016). Public Affairs Education for a New Generation. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(1), 7–10.
Selwyn, N., Boraschi, D., & Özkula, S. M. (2009). Drawing Digital Pictures: An Investigation of Primary Pupils’ Representations of ICT and Schools. British Educational Research Journal, 35(6), 909–928. http://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902834282
Shkedi, A. (2019). Introduction to Data Analysis in Qualitative Research. Singapore: Springer International Publishing.
Smith, K. S. (2019). Architectural Sketches and the Power of Caricature. Journal of Architectural Education, 44(1), 49–58.
Somekh, B. (2006). Action Research : a Methodology for Change and Development. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Stokes, J. (2016). Competencies: A Unifying Thread for Education, Practice and Public Protection. Canadian Social Work Review / Revue Canadienne de Service Social, 33(1), 125–132.
Storey, J. (2006). Cultural Studies dan Kajian Budaya Pop. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
Uidhir, C. M. (2013). Epistemic Misuse and Abuse of Pictorial Caricature. American Philosophical Quarterly, 50(2), 137–151.
Weisgerber, J. (2019). Satire and Irony as Means of Communication. Comparative Literature Studies, 10(2), 157–172.
Weisl-Shaw, A. (2010). The Comedy of Didacticism and the Didacticism of Comedy in Calila E Dimna and Sendebar. The Modern Language Review, 105(3), 732–742.
Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol Formation: An Organismic-Developmental Approach to Language and the Expression ff Thought. New York: Wiley.
Young, R. O. (2017). Persuasive Communication: How Audiences Decide (2nd editio). New York: Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687117
Zoebazary, I. (2010). Kamus Istilah Televisi dan Film. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.36080/ag.v7i2.919
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Avant Garde
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Visit to our university official website: www.budiluhur.ac.id