Mekanisme Kemitraan dalam Pengendalian Kejahatan Lintas Negara (Analisis Kasus Korupsi Alstom oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi)

Sari Wardhani Ismakoen

Abstract


Organized crime today is a pressing concern in every country, whether as a supply, transit, or victim country. Criminal networks have spread all over the world and cross borders, so efforts to combat transnational crime must also use cross-border cooperation to ensure that organized crime networks do not simply divert their activities to countries or regions where cooperation is weak as a reflection of the weak criminal justice response. Corruption is a transnational crime. The results of corruption are often hidden by criminals with mechanisms that make law enforcement efforts and efforts to return assets against state losses not optimal. This is similar to corruption cases in Indonesia which use cross-jurisdictional affiliations to obscure traces of corruption acquisition. Law enforcement officials face many obstacles and problems in handling issues to trace the flow of criminal funds (follow the money) and track perpetrators (follow the suspect) records when criminal offenders are affiliated with criminal offenders across Indonesian or foreign jurisdictions. Therefore, cooperation in handling transnational crimes is one of the conditions for successfully resolving corruption cases. The implementation of cooperation is adapting to the strategic focus of each institution, which can be in the form of investigation, law enforcement, prevention, awareness, and education, or a combination of several elements or as an entire. The pattern of cooperation can be in the form of networking, coordinating, cooperating, and collaborating. Analyzing the Alstom case handled by the KPK provides a practical example of an inter-agency counter-crime cooperation strategy to tackle corruption and recover state assets.

Keywords


transnational crime; corruption; cross-border cooperation, patterns of cooperation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berry, G., Briggs, P., Erol, R., & Van Staden, L. (2011). The Effectiveness of Partnership Working In A Crime and Disorder Context: A Rapid Evidence Assessment.

Direktorat Pembinaan Jaringan Kerja Antar Komisi dan Instansi KPK. (2020). Praktik Terbaik Kerja Sama Internasional KPK dalam Penanganan Perkara Korupsi Lintas Yurisdiksi.

Harrison, P. & Dermawan, K.D. (2021). Majelis Taklim dan Pencegahan Kejahatan Perkotaan (Sebuah Upaya Pencarian Model Pemberdayaan Baru). NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. e-ISSN: 2550-0813 | p-ISSN: 2541-657X | Vol 8 No 5. Hal. : 1448-1464. http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/nusantara/index.

Himmelman, A.T. (2002). Collaboration for a change: definitions, decision-making models, roles, and collaboration process guide. Himmelman Consulting, Minneapolis, MN.

Mazerolle, L, Cherney, A, Eggins, E, Hine, L, Higginson, A. (2021) Multiagency programs with police as a partner for reducing radicalisation to violence. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17, e1162. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1162

Nyingchia, K.H. (2020) The institutional approach to the fight against corruption: The case of the national anti-corruption commission of Cameroon. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, (8,2) Doi.Org/10.18196/Hi.82152

Pajón, L & Walsh, D (2022) The importance of multi-agency collaborations during human trafficking criminal investigations. Policing and Society, 33:3. 296-314, DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2022.2106984

Rosenbaum, Dennis. (2002). Evaluating multi-agency anti-crime partnerships: Theory, design, and measurement issues. Crime Prevention Studies. 14.

Schneider, S., Beare, M., & Hill, J. (2000). Alternative approaches to combating transnational crime. Canada: The Federal Transnational Crime Working Group (TCWG). Policy Research Initiative (PRI)

Sindonews, (2013, Agustus 22). Kasus PLTU, perusahaan Jepang diduga suap Emir Moeis. https://sin.do/u/android

Staniforth, R. A., Jennings, U., Henderson, J., & Mitchell, S. (2019). Using multi-agency, multi-professional collaboration to reduce serious violence and organized crime. Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being, 4(3), 63–65. https://doi.org/10.35502/jcswb.102

Stead, J., Lloyd, G., & Kendrick, A. (2001). Hanging on in there: a study of inter-agency work to prevent school exclusion in three local authorities. London: National Children’s Bureau and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

The Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development. (2017). Effective inter-agency cooperation in fighting tax crimes and other financial crimes.

The United Nations Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders. (1999). Legal Framework Against Transnational Organized Crime By Criminal Justice Systems In Different Countries.

UNODC. (2009). Combating transnational organized crime. https://www.unodc.org/southasia/en/topics/frontpage/2009/combating-transnational-organised-crime.html

Van Felius, M., Bater, L., Ransley, J., and Martin, P (2023): Engaging non-policing partners to prevent or respond to crime. Policing and Society, DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2023.2189251

Warmington, P., Daniels, H., Edwards, A., & Brown, S. (2004). Learning in and for interagency working Interagency Collaboration: a literature review.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36080/djk.2310

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Deviance Jurnal Kriminologi is indexed by:

Sinta Logo Crossref Logo Garuda Logo OpenAIRE Logo Google Scholar Logo Road Logo

Deviance Jurnal Kriminologi works in collaboration with:

APVI Logo MAHUPIKI Logo
 
Creative Commons

Deviance Jurnal Kriminologi is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Editorial Office:

Faculty of Social Sciences and Global Studies, Universitas Budi Luhur, Jl. Ciledug Raya, Petukangan Utara, Pesanggrahan, Jakarta Selatan, DKI Jakarta 12260

Tel: (021) 5853753, Email: jurnaldeviance@budiluhur.ac.id