Intervention by Separation and Reunification of Victims of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy
Abstract
and reunifications children as victims of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy against their
parents as perpetrators of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. The subjects of this study were
9 expert figures with different backgrounds and several previous research journals as
references. This research uses interpretative analysis by using an unstructured interview
method and journal review for secondary data. After the data is collected completely and
thoroughly, both from primary and secondary data collection, the data can be grouped or
adjusted according to the type of data obtained from interviews with research subjects and
previous research based on the journals. The results showed that the separation intervention
is still one of the intervention methods used for victims of child abuse. However, this
intervention can also cause deep psychological wounds in children due to being separated
from their parents, where the trauma from the separation will greatly affect the
psychological development of children in terms of their trust in others. Apart from that,
reunification is still very possible, but the possibility of repeated acts of violence is also
quite high. Continued and prolonged counseling is needed to minimize these negative impacts however, this follow-up step is still difficult to do, especially in Indonesia due to
the lack of human resources from related institutions or agencies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ayoub, C. C., Schreier, H. A., & Keller, C. (2002). Munchausen by Poxy: Presentations in Special Education. Child Maltreatment, 7(2), 149-159.
Berg, B., & Jones, D. P. (1999). Outcome of psychiatric intervention in factitious illness by proxy (Munchausen's syndrome by proxy). Archives of Disease in Childhood, 81(6), 465-472.
Bretz, S. W., & Richards, J. R. (2000). Munchausen syndrome presenting acutely in the Emergency Department. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(4), 417-420.
Brown, P., Tierney, C., & Serwint, J. R. (2009). Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Pediatrics in Review, 30(10), 414-415.
Jones, D. P., & Bools, C. N. (1999). Factitious illness by proxy. In T. David, Recent Advances in Paediatrics (pp. 57-71). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Paramita, T. (2021). Pemahaman terhadap munchausen syndrome by proxy dan hubungannya dengan perlindungan anak di Indonesia [Unpublished postgraduate's thesis]. University of Indonesia.
Paturej, A., Pogonowska, M., & Kalicki, B. (2019). Munchausen Syndrom by Proxy - a case report. Pediatr Med Rodz, Vol 15, 93-96.
Shaw, R., Dayal, S., Hartman, J., & DeMaso, D. (2008). Factitious disorder by proxy: Pediatric condition falsification. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 16(4), 215-224.
Siegel, P. T., & Fischer, H. (2010). Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome: Barriers to Detection, Confirmation, and Intervention. Children's Services, Vol 4, 31-50.
Steel, R. M. (2009). Factitious disorder (Munchausen's syndrome). J R Coll Physician, 39, 343-347.
Stirling, J. (2007). Beyond munchausen syndrome by proxy: Identification and treatment of child abuse in a medical setting. PEDIATRICS, 119(5), 1026-1030.
Wahi, M. M., Stone, K. V., Chance, M., & Miller, C. E. (2017). Patient-Centered Medicine and Prevention of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. Patience Centered Medicine, 19-49.
Walk, A. E., & Davies, S. C. (2010). Munchausen syndrome by proxy: Identification and Intervention. Counselor Education and Human Services Faculty Publications, 32, 1-14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36080/djk.1372
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Deviance Jurnal Kriminologi is indexed by:
Deviance Jurnal Kriminologi works in collaboration with:
Deviance Jurnal Kriminologi is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Editorial Office:
Faculty of Social Sciences and Global Studies, Universitas Budi Luhur, Jl. Ciledug Raya, Petukangan Utara, Pesanggrahan, Jakarta Selatan, DKI Jakarta 12260
Tel: (021) 5853753, Email: jurnaldeviance@budiluhur.ac.id